Qanon: Ending the Debate, Once and For All

People keep asking me about Qanon, so I'm going to address it here in this post.

(NOTE: If you want to read all Qanon posts yourself, visit

Qanon is said to be a person (or group of roughly 3 people) working within military intelligence with extremely close access to the President of the United States, Donald Trump. The letter "Q" represents a compartmentalized level of security clearance within the US government. "Anon" stands for anonymous.

Since the end of 2017 Q has been posting on the message board 8chan. The messages seem to serve as a road map for what is happening behind the scenes in the administration--mostly related to "draining the swamp" and how the administration is dealing with rooting out corruption (by both Republicans and Democrats) within the government.

There have only been a few references to Q in mainstream news outlets. Those articles have been hit pieces clearly designed to discredit Q and curiously left out a lot of important information the average reader might need to know, if they want to assess for themselves the likelihood that the Qanon phenomenon is real.

I would suspect that part of the reason for hit pieces by mainstream journalists and dismissing Q as a "conspiracy theory" might be that Q has exposed quite a few of them for unethical behavior. For instance, a June 16, 2018 Q post stated, "These reporters and networks have been named in the Wikileaks to have colluded with the DNC or Hillary campaign during the 2016 election cycle," and then named the following: ABC, AP, Bloomberg, Buzzfeed, CBS, CNBC, CNN, Daily Beast, Huffington Post, MSNBC, NBC, New Yorker, NPR, New York Times, PBS, People, Politico, Reuters, The Hill, Vice, Vox, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and Yahoo. The e-mails have been made public and are available on the Wikileaks website, so this information is actually verifiable. Q even calls out specific journalists by name. Curiously enough, these are the same news outlets that have demonstrated nothing but abject bias against and hatred toward President Trump. The journalists named are people we see every single day on television saying vile things against the President. Coincidence?

Now, if you're new this this topic and not familiar with how Q communicates, sometimes Q provides
direct information, sometimes Q provides answers in the form of questions and sometimes Q just gives questions for the reader to research on their own. After all, some of the topics deal with highly classified information, so to avoid illegal disclosure, it's important that readers confirm some information on their own.

I'm going to summarize some of the information that I've found to be interesting.

On June 15, 2018 Q mentioned that the Presidential records of Barack Obama are sealed, then asked if this was unusual (which it is). Q then asks why 42 of Obama's staff were able to obtain security clearances without going through an FBI background check. Q hints that the reader should cross reference this with Imran Awan, the Pakistani Congressional IT staffer to former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was friends with Seth Rich and tried (unsuccessfully) to flee the country after wiring $300,000 to Pakistan. Q suggests that there was a Pakistani and Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the Obama administration.

Is any of that true? Well, if it turned out to be true we would be looking at a scandal of considerable magnitude. Interestingly enough, there has been a media blackout.

In several posts, Q discussed the Iran deal, stating that leaders of the European Union care only about protecting their flow of money, not the safety and security of their people or the world. Q also stated that the Iran deal was orchestrated for the sole purpose of lifting sanctions to allow access of foreign businesses for individual enrichment. Additionally, Q suggests there was $1.7 billion transferred to Iran via 5 planes that used 4 separate routes and that the entire thing was organized and planned by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Q suggested that there were bribes, kickbacks and special interest groups involved. Q asks, "What US/EU companies immediately closed large deals in Iran post deal?" Then, Q tells readers to cross-check those companies against political and (Clinton) foundation payments. Q asks, "Why are people panicking about Iran deal pullout?" Then, says, "THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE," referring to Clinton losing the election to Trump. Finally, Q said that the Iran deal had nothing to do with nukes and that it was just a cover. Would this explain why European leaders were so apoplectic with President Trump when he pulled out of the deal?

It's worth noting that Q also suggests that Iran created a classified remote nuclear facility in Northern Syria, which was the real reason why our military bombed Syria in the spring of 2018. Q suggests that Iran's nuclear program never ceased, despite Obama's deal and that the nuclear material from the Uranium One deal actually ended up being used in Iran's nuclear program. For those not familiar, the Uranium One deal was a transaction that resulted in Clinton approving the sale of 20% of our nation's uranium to Russia, allegedly in exchange for millions of dollars. Q suggests Russia transferred that uranium to Iran for use in their nuclear weapons program.

Speaking about upcoming information that will soon be released, in May, Q wrote, "What you are about to learn should not only scare you, but intensify your resolve to take back control [Freedom]. The information that will become public will further demonstrate the criminal & corrupt abuse of power that the (Obama) administration undertook in joint efforts w/ domestic and foreign dignitaries. The snowball has begun rolling - there is no stopping it now." Of course, very soon after, the report from the Inspector General was released, along with some private communications of FBI and DOJ officials demonstrating there was indeed corruption within the administration. Much more is expected to come out this year as sealed indictments become public and John Huber, a special prosecutor from Utah appointed by US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, starts wrapping up his investigations.

Q has posted photos aboard Air Force One, the President's aircraft. Q has posted photos of executive orders on the President's desk in the Oval Office, prior to the release of those executive orders to the public. Q posted a photo inside of a US Secret Service vehicle on duty. And Q told us about the North Korea deal before it happened. Q would have to be someone with direct access to the President, who engages with President Trump rather frequently.

If Qanon is just a conspiracy theory, how is it possible that Q knows what the President will say before he says it? How does Q have access to the President doing things have have not been publicized, such as a morning walk? How is it that Q has been proven right multiple times since the end of 2017?

Adding to the mystery, in a message on May 10, 2018, Q said, "Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here," suggesting that 1) Q is someone whose name the average person would recognize and 2) the public will eventually be made aware of the identity of Q. The kicker is that if Q is a real person, it means all of the information provided is actually true.

The Q posts are a fascinating read in much the same way a book like the Bible is fascinating: even if you don't believe everything you're reading, it's interesting to see the text.

Q has also posted about:
  • John Legend and ties to the Clinton Foundation
  • Pedophelia networks
  • US officials involved in Human trafficking
  • Facebook "listening to you 24/7/365. Literally."
  • Seth Rich being connected to MS-13 and the DNC
  • Kate Spade's suicide
  • Social media giants soon collapsing
  • Saudi Arabia providing tens of millions of dollars to senior US government officials
  • John Huber's investigation and 40,000 sealed indictments that have been filed
  • Twitter CEO Jack's secret Twitter handle
  • The Parkland shooting
  • The Capital Gazette shooting
  • Who "really" controlled North Korea, prior to President Trump's deal
...and a ton of other things.

But, MOST important is the message that Q communicates, most dangerous of all to the establishment: Americans need to be united and stop allowing the mainstream media to divide us with propaganda. Q encourages us to pursue research and truth about what's happening in our nation. Q encourages the US population to stop hating each other and stand united for the best interests of the country. Q has used the phrase "Where We Go One We Go All!" as a rallying cry meant to unite the citizens of the US, to motivate us, to inspire us and to foster a patriotic spirit. Regardless of the authenticity of the Q identity, you'll find most people hard pressed to argue against such a positive, unifying message.

So, to the people who have asked me what I think about Q; to those who have dismissed this phenomenon as a conspiracy; to those in the mainstream media who take umbrage with posts from an alleged military intelligence asset (or team of assets) I will now provide my answer on this topic.

I neither affirm nor deny a belief in Q.

However, I will say: to any reporter, you can end this whole thing right now. So, I urge you to simply ask Sarah Sanders or President Trump directly, in a press briefing to comment once and for all on if the Qanon phenomenon is real or not. I mean, if it's all just a conspiracy you have nothing to lose, right?

"The world is watching."


Look great & show support by buying exclusive patriot gear at my online store: